Dark premium Mercedes-Benz interior with glowing head unit
Mercedes-Benz · Automotive UX

Mercedes-Benz MBUX App

Designing a mobile companion app for the MBUX ecosystem, comfort controls for rear-seat passengers, informed by a research study on platform-native versus MBUX-adapted design patterns.

Client
Mercedes-Benz
Role
UX Research · UI Design · Prototyping · User Testing
Focus
Automotive UX · Companion app · Cross-platform design
Status
Public summary · details on request

01 / Context

A premium car, and a passenger who wants control.

MBUX gives Mercedes-Benz drivers a rich, connected digital environment. But rear passengers, often in high-end models, lack the same level of control over comfort features: massage, ambient lighting, seat position, Energizing programmes.

The project explored a mobile companion app that brings these controls to the passenger's own smartphone or tablet, as a natural extension of the MBUX system, without requiring them to lean forward or ask the driver.

MBUX voice assistant: How may I help you?
MBUX in-car, the ecosystem the app needed to extend.
MBUX home screen: Media, Mercedes-Benz Advanced Control, Apps
MBUX home, the connected vehicle platform.

02 / Research question

Native patterns or MBUX-adapted, which serves users better?

Before designing, we needed to answer a fundamental question: should the app follow iOS and Android native design conventions, familiar and fast to learn, or adapt to the MBUX visual language for consistency with the in-car system?

We analysed 32 design elements across both approaches (Konsistenz vs Adaption) on iOS and Android, evaluating which delivered clearer, more usable interactions in the specific context of rear-seat vehicle use.

Tablet study results: Konsistenz 16 vs Adaption 16
Tablet results, even split: 16 elements favoured native consistency, 16 MBUX adaptation.
Smartphone study results: Konsistenz 8 vs Adaption 24
Smartphone results, adaptation wins on smaller screens: 24 elements favoured MBUX visual language.

03 / The app

Comfort controls, Massage, Seat, Ambient, Energizing.

The research directly shaped the interface: MBUX-adapted on smartphone, balanced on tablet, visual coherence with the in-car system, intuitive to use from a rear seat.

iOS and Android mockups of the Massage comfort controls
iOS & Android, MBUX-adapted visual language on smartphone.
iPad mockup of the Massage interface with seat visualisation
Tablet, balanced adaptation. 3D seat visualisation, programme list, per-seat control.
In-car user testing: prototype running on phone and tablet in a real Mercedes

Tested in the actual car. Not just on a screen.

04 / User testing

Prototype in hand. Real vehicle. Real seat.

Testing happened in the actual vehicle, passengers seated in the rear, prototype on their own device, comfort features live. This surfaced real friction points: handling a phone while seated, glancing at controls without losing the ride experience, one-handed navigation.

User testing session inside a Mercedes-Benz, two people with iPad and notes
In-car session, iterative testing led directly to simplified navigation and clearer hierarchy.

05 / Outcome

A research-backed, premium-feeling companion app.

The project delivered both a research framework (Konsistenz vs Adaption) and an actual app design, tested in the car, refined through iteration, coherent with the MBUX visual language on the platforms where it mattered most.

Research study: 32 elements, iOS & Android
Design decision framework (Konsistenz vs Adaption)
Comfort controls app, iOS, Android, tablet
3D seat visualisation & interaction model
In-car user testing & iterative refinement
Implementation-ready prototype

06 / What I learned

Context changes which patterns work.

The same design pattern that feels natural on a smartphone can feel out of place on a car-mounted tablet. Screen size, posture, glare, one-hand use and the expectation of premium quality all shifted which conventions served users best. The Konsistenz vs Adaption study made that tangible and data-backed.

Testing in the real vehicle was the most valuable part of the process. Friction that didn't appear in usability labs showed up immediately in real seats, and fixing it led to a significantly simpler final design.


Working on a complex mobility or companion app?

Let's turn your product challenge into something testable.